19 research outputs found

    Uncovering Latent Archetypes from Digital Trace Sequences: An Analytical Method and Empirical Example

    Get PDF
    The widespread availability of digital trace data provides new opportunities for researchers to understand human behaviors at a large scale. Sequences of behavior, captured when individuals interface with an information system, can be analyzed to uncover behavioral trends and tendencies. Rather than assume homogeneity among actors, in this study we introduce a method for identifying subsets of the population which demonstrate similar behavioral trends. The objective of this analysis would be to identify a finite set of behavioral archetypes, which we define as distinct patterns of action displayed by unique subsets of a population. This study makes a contribution to the literature by introducing a novel methodology for analyzing sequences of digital traces. We apply our technique to data from a lab experiment featuring thirty twenty-person teams communicating over Skype

    A Dynamic Sequence Model of Information Sharing Processes in Virtual Teams

    Get PDF
    Sharing information is a critical component of virtual team functioning. While prior research has identified the motivations for and the structure of information sharing, there has been little emphasis on the dynamic patterning of sharing behavior. In this study, we focus on the process of information sharing, namely the sequence and timing of individual decisions during a virtual team task. Further, we argue that sharing behaviors can be categorized into a finite number of approaches. We propose a temporal, event-based model to uncover the behavioral and cognitive factors that influence information sharing. With a sample of 600 participants organized into thirty ad hoc virtual teams, we demonstrate significant heterogeneity in sharing propensities. Our study makes two contributions to the extant literature. First, we extend theories regarding the motivation and structure of information sharing. Second, we make a broader methodological contribution with the application of a latent-class relational event model

    The Fluidity of an Individual’s Core-Periphery Position in Digital Knowledge Fields

    Get PDF
    The literature on digital knowledge fields suggests that knowledge coproducers are embedded in a core-periphery social structure. This structure engenders an individual-level tension: be in the core where there is support for successful knowledge integration, or be in the periphery where one can work outside of peer pressure. In this paper, we focus on the fluidity of core-periphery structures in digital knowledge fields. We study the case of nanoHUB, a digital, interdisciplinary knowledge field of nanoscience and engineering. We analyze 17,821 contributions made by 251 knowledge producers who coproduce 609 scientific simulation tools over a nearly ten-year period, encompassing over six million lines of code. We find that knowledge producers seek to resolve the core-periphery tension by moving towards and then away from the temporal core. Additionally, we find that proximity to the temporal core at the point of the knowledge production has a curvilinear relationship with code produced

    Models as Social Actors in the Diffusion of AI Innovations: A Multilayer, Heterogeneous, Dynamic Network Perspective

    Get PDF
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a crucial facet of contemporary technological innovation, influencing diverse domains. Consequently, understanding the diffusion and evolution of AI innovations is vital. Scholarly publications have commonly served as proxies for studying these AI innovations. However, previous studies on publication diffusion have largely overlooked the role of models, which is particularly integral for AI innovations as they bridge upstream datasets and downstream applications. Moreover, models form an interdependent network due to their combinational evolution. This paper addresses this gap, examining how the location, movement, and speed of model movement in that model network affect the dissemination of AI research. Using a four-layer network—author collaborations, paper citations, model dependencies, and keyword co-occurrences—we examine 345,383 AI papers from 2000 to 2022. This research aims to contribute to the diffusion of innovation literature and dynamic network analysis, offering several novel insights and advancements

    Preregistration of Information Systems Research

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we introduce the preregistration concept for experiments in the information systems (IS) discipline. Preregistration constitutes a way to commit to analytic steps before collecting or observing data and, thus, mitigate any biases authors may have (consciously or not) towards reporting significant findings. We explain why preregistration matters, how to preregister a study, the benefits of preregistration, and common arguments against preregistration. We also offer a call to action for authors to conduct more preregistered work in IS

    Emotions in Microblogs and Information Diffusion: Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship

    Get PDF
    How is emotional content shared on microblogging platforms? Prior work has proposed that emotionally charged content is diffused more than emotionally neutral content because it can evoke physiological arousal in platform users. Drawing on recent research in IS, we argue that the real relationship between emotions and Information Diffusion is an inverse U-shaped relationship; moderately strong emotions lead to optimal diffusion. We further theorize that this relationship is moderated by discourse context and valence of emotions. We test these hypotheses by testing a Twitter dataset that includes tweets collected from multiple conversation contexts. Results show broad support for our hypotheses and extend prior work on emotional content in microblogging

    Vero: A Method for Remotely Studying Human-AI Collaboration

    Get PDF
    Despite the recognized need in the IS community to prepare for a future of human-AI collaboration, the technical skills necessary to develop and deploy AI systems are considerable, making such research difficult to perform without specialized knowledge. To make human-AI collaboration research more accessible, we developed a novel experimental method that combines a video conferencing platform, controlled content, and Wizard of Oz methods to simulate a group interaction with an AI teammate. Through a case study, we demonstrate the flexibility and ease of deployment of this approach. We also provide evidence that the method creates a highly believable experience of interacting with an AI agent. By detailing this method, we hope that multidisciplinary researchers can replicate it to more easily answer questions that will inform the design and development of future human-AI collaboration technologies

    OPEN COMMUNITY HEALTH: WORKSHOP REPORT

    Get PDF
    This report summarizes key outcomes from a workshop on open community health conducted at the University of Nebraska at Omaha in April 2018. Workshop members represented research and practice communities across Citizen Science, Open Source, and Wikipedia. The outcomes from the workshop include (1) comparisons among these communities, (2) how a shared understanding and assessment of open community health can be developed, and (3) a taxonomical comparison to begin a conversation between these communities that have developed disparate languages

    Algorithmic Appreciation in Creative Tasks

    No full text
    Algorithms have long outperformed humans in tasks with objective answers. In medicine, finance, chess, and other objective fields, AI have been shown to consistently outperform human cognition. However, algorithms currently underperform human cognition in creative tasks, such as writing fiction or brainstorming ideas. We propose a study that investigates how humans rely on algorithmic and human recommendations differently in creative tasks, and whether that effect changes based on task difficulty. We synthesize the current theoretical landscape and propose what the likely effects of algorithmic versus human recommendations are on cognitive effort, belief change, and confidence in output
    corecore